Friday, November 4, 2016
Fear of Trump Presidency on Full Display Following RNC
Fear of Trump Presidency on Full Display Following RNC
An animals response to a perceived mortal threat is fear. Fear, in turn, triggers the fight or flight response. Humans behave the same way, although we alone feel threatened by words particularly of those we disagree with, dont understand or cant control whether theyre directed at us or not.
More and more in our media-centric connected world, we attack in kind.
Judging by the overwhelming number of petty, malicious and downright vicious media attacks social and traditional on nearly everyone who spoke at the Republican National Convention (RNC) last week, Donald Trumps candidacy appears to threaten a lot of people.
Dont get me wrong. Some of it was thoughtful and substantive analysis of Trumps often over-the-top statements and controversial policies. But much of it amounts to little more than clickable headlines with trivial content or dubious arguments with just enough red meat to rally the masses against the threat of a Trump presidency.
There must have been hundreds if not thousands of articles on Melania Trumps speech gaff. How many ways can the media desperately try to spin a terrible mistake by a speech writer into something meaningful to a presidential campaign? Apparently, quite a lot. Never mind that it wasnt the candidate himself but his wife.
Then theres Trumps eldest daughter, Ivanka. Nobody could find anything wrong with her speech, so the media turned to clothing. One commentator dug up some obscure issues with Ivankas clothing line. Another tried to turn the $138 dress she bought at Macys into some horrible snafu, given her fathers feud with the retailer.
Continue Reading Below
ADVERTISEMENT
Prior to the event, some among the Silicon Valley elite were whining that tech billionaire Peter Thiels speech might sully the tech industrys pristine brand (guilt by association, I guess). But other than becoming the first RNC speaker to say "Im proud to be gay," there really wasnt much to it.
Nevertheless, the media found things to pick on. One journalist tried to make a case that Thiels reasons for backing Trump makes absolutely no sense at all. Never mind that Thiel is one of the most successful serial entrepreneurs and venture capitalists of our era.
Dont even get me started on the columnist who repeatedly called New Jersey Governor Chris Christie "Big Chicken" in a critique of his speech. Or another who found a way to write 500 words on Trumps running mate Mike Pence not about his policies or track record as Governor of Indiana, mind you, but about a five-second clip showing his reaction to something Trump said. I kid you not.
Meanwhile, media and entertainment elites took to the Twitterverse to demonstrate just how inclusive they are of viewpoints they dont agree with.
Trump nemesis Rosie ODonnell called him the "voice" of "white racist sexist Americans." Arianna Huffington tweeted "the angriest acceptance speech I can remember" and "who here believes he understands the Mideast, the origins of ISIS and whats fueling it, raise your hand?"
Actor Alan Cumming said, "He thinks LGBT is a sandwich." Marlon Wayans tweeted "Trumps daughter just gave a great speech Who the f--- was she talking about." And Michael Moore wrote, "First Republican ever to use the word "peace" in any speech. So I guess that means, war." I didnt quite understand that, but it still got over a thousand retweets and likes. Go figure.
You expect that sort of nonsense from the right-fearing media and entertainers, but Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban unleashed a tweetstorm during Trumps acceptance speech on Thursday. The childish Twitter tantrum attacked everything from the real estate moguls mannerisms and character
to the way he hugs his family.
Hes a real class act, that Cuban. And, in my opinion, his gross mischaracterizations of Trumps policy positions were absolutely ludicrous.
Youve got to wonder if any of these people realize how revealing their rhetoric is. They are absolutely terrified of this man and what he represents, just as they were of Sarah Palin after her 2008 RNC speech. Who knew you could learn so much about what makes people tick, just from their response to a political convention. Its stunning, really.
Available link for download